3 Key Parallel Computing Concepts for Distributed ML

Understand foundational parallel computing concepts such as SIMD, multithreading, and GPU kernels that underpin distributed machine learning. Learn how mastering these fundamentals helps optimize your ML systems before scaling to multi-node setups.

In my previous article, I introduced distributed machine learning (ML) and why it has become crucial for training and deploying today’s massive ML models. Models such as GPT-4, Stable Diffusion, and other frontier AI systems now operate at a scale that was previously unimaginable. They require computational resources that exceed the capabilities of a single processor, GPU, or even an entire server! To effectively handle these enormous workloads, we need to divide these complex computations across multiple GPUs, nodes, or clusters that can run in parallel.

However, before we dive deeper into distributed ML, we need to first understand where these concepts came from. It all begins with parallel computing. Take a large computational task, break it into smaller independent subtasks, process these subtasks independently at the same time, and finally merge the results together. This pattern of divide, parallelize, and aggregate forms the backbone of all parallel computing!

To fully grasp the concept of distributed ML, we’ll first need to grasp simpler forms of parallelism clearly. Concepts like SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data), multi-threading, and GPU kernels are key concepts to master before jumping into distributed ML.

So let’s dive right in!

SIMD: The Lowest-Level of Parallelism

SIMD stands for Single Instruction, Multiple Data. It represents parallelism at the lowest, most fundamental hardware level (processor’s instruction set and registers) and directly operates at the processor’s assembly or instruction level.

To better understand SIMD, let’s take a practical example: vector addition. Suppose you have two large numeric vectors, each with millions of elements. Let’s say you want to add these vectors element by element. In a naive, sequential approach, we would load each element into a CPU register, add them, and then write the result back. Imagine repeating this millions of times. Clearly, this would be super inefficient!

Modern processors, like Intel CPUs with AVX-512 capabilities, have wide SIMD registers. For instance, AVX-512 provides 512-bit-wide registers. Each of these registers can hold sixteen 32-bit floating-point numbers at once. This will allow the processor to add sixteen pairs of numbers simultaneously within a single CPU cycle, thereby dramatically speeding up computations (at least theoretically)!

SIMD is more than just a theoretical concept. It’s at the very core of making machine learning efficient on modern CPUs. Intel, for example, uses its advanced AVX-512 SIMD capabilities along with specialized extensions such as VNNI (Vector Neural Network Instructions), collectively referred to as “Deep Learning Boost,” to significantly accelerate AI inference workloads. These instructions efficiently handle common machine learning operations that are fundamental in neural network inference to give significant speedup.

Yet, as powerful as SIMD is, remember that other factors significantly impact real-world performance! In one of my previous roles at a semiconductor company, I was optimizing an image-processing algorithm for a mobile chipset. I initially thought SIMD would deliver huge speed improvements. But the actual results fell short of my expectations. Why? Because memory latency had become the bottleneck. The CPU spent too much time waiting for data to be loaded from RAM into registers. Techniques like prefetching into cache and optimizing memory access patterns helped. But the critical lesson here is that computing power alone isn’t enough. Efficient memory management, fast data movement, and minimizing network or I/O bottlenecks are equally important to achieving meaningful performance improvements.

Multithreading: Parallelism at the Software Level

Another key parallelism strategy is multithreading. Software applications can create and manage multiple threads to run tasks simultaneously. Unlike SIMD, which is parallelism handled directly at the hardware instruction level, threading is orchestrated at the operating system and application software layer.

Threading can help achieve parallelism in 2 ways:

• Task parallelism: Different threads perform entirely different tasks in parallel. Imagine you’re developing a complex software application, like a real-time video game. One thread could manage physics simulations, calculating object collisions and movements. Another thread could handle graphics rendering at the same time. Each thread performs distinct tasks independently.
• Data parallelism: Multiple threads execute the same task on different portions of data concurrently. Suppose you’re applying image filters to millions of pixels. Instead of sequentially processing each pixel, you split the image into smaller sections, assigning each section to a different thread to run in parallel. This can help dramatically speed up the overall computation.

Remember, threading also introduces complexity. Whether the threads actually execute in parallel depends heavily on your hardware. Single-core processors don’t offer true parallel execution. They rapidly switch between threads in a process called context switching. While this appears parallel, it’s just fast sequential execution. Context switching itself introduces overhead, reducing the potential speedup.

Multi-core processors truly enable parallel execution by running threads simultaneously on separate cores. However, this comes with the complexity of synchronization. If threads access shared resources like memory simultaneously, synchronization mechanisms must ensure consistency, causing threads to wait. Excessive synchronization reduces overall performance significantly.

How does this relate to ML?

When combined effectively with SIMD instructions and optimizations like quantization, multithreading allows CPUs to serve as a viable alternative to GPUs in several practical ML use-cases:

1. Inference at massive scale: When GPU costs become prohibitive at massive scale, super-optimized multithreaded CPU implementations can significantly reduce infrastructure expenses while still providing sufficient performance.
2. Smaller models: For models that fit comfortably into CPU memory or are lightweight enough, combining SIMD, quantization, and threading across multiple cores delivers GPU-like inference performance at a lower cost.
3. Edge computing scenarios: In edge-environments (such as your mobile or IoT device) where GPUs are either unavailable, fully occupied by higher-priority tasks, or too power-hungry, multithreading paired with SIMD optimizations on CPUs becomes a highly effective way to deploy and run ML inference.

GPU Kernels: Massively Parallel Computing

Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) take parallel computing to an entirely new level. Unlike CPUs, which typically have a small number of powerful cores optimized for sequential tasks, GPUs contain thousands of smaller, lightweight processing units specifically designed for massively parallel computations. This makes GPUs ideally suited for highly parallel workloads common in deep learning.

There are three key concepts related to GPU’s:

• Kernel: A kernel is a small function that runs in parallel across many GPU threads. Think of it as a tiny program executed in parallel thousands of times, each instance working independently on a different piece of data.
• Threads: These are the smallest units of parallel execution in GPU programming. Each thread independently executes the kernel’s instructions, often processing a small portion of the overall data.
• Blocks and Grids: GPU threads are further grouped into units called blocks. Multiple threads within a block can share fast local memory, thereby enabling efficient collaboration and quicker access to frequently used data. These blocks are then organized into a grid. The structured hierarchy of grids, blocks, and threads allows the GPU to efficiently schedule and execute millions of threads simultaneously.

To illustrate this concept clearly, let us revisit the vector-addition example again. You have two massive numeric vectors, each containing millions of elements that you want to add element by element. Instead of sequentially processing them or even processing small groups with SIMD, you could launch a GPU kernel. This kernel runs across thousands of threads simultaneously. Each GPU thread independently computes the addition for a few specific elements from the vectors. Threads are grouped into blocks, and each block processes a subset of data using shared memory for faster access.

Just as with SIMD and threading, the broader lesson I have learned over the years is that raw computing power alone isn’t sufficient. Optimizing memory, network, and I/O patterns is equally important for meaningful performance gains. Most importantly, you may need to rethink your algorithm’s design to ensure it’s inherently parallel, carefully minimizing sequential bottlenecks that can severely limit overall performance.

Pro Tip: Always prefer using highly optimized GPU libraries like NVIDIA cuDNN and cuBLAS rather than writing GPU kernels yourself! Frameworks accelerated by these libraries (such as PyTorch) deliver near-peak hardware performance, significantly outperforming custom-written kernels.

Why These Concepts Matter for Distributed ML

The fundamental principles of dividing large tasks, performing computations in parallel, and aggregating the results form the basis of both simple parallelism and complex distributed ML workflows.

A crucial insight from my own 15+ years of experience in this domain is that raw computational power alone rarely guarantees optimal performance. Effective parallelism demands thoughtful attention to memory latency, network communication, and efficient data management. SIMD and GPU kernels examples I provided earlier illustrate clearly how memory bottlenecks can drastically limit your potential performance gains, even if parallel compute capacity is abundant.

To successfully distribute work in parallel, you must also rethink your algorithms and data structures design. You must minimize sequential bottlenecks and dependencies, structuring your computations so they can run in parallel wherever possible.

In future articles, I’ll continue building upon this foundation by exploring distributed ML frameworks, communication protocols, optimization strategies, and practical architectures used by industry leaders.

Stay tuned, there’s much more ahead!

Related Reading

Enjoyed this article? To further build your foundational knowledge, check out my previous articles on how software engineers and tech leaders can effectively upskill in AI/ML! My ongoing series of deep-dive articles is designed specifically to help engineering and research leaders evolve their skill sets, balance technical expertise with leadership responsibilities, and stay ahead in a rapidly changing technical landscape:

• The New Technical Leadership: Embracing AI/ML as a Core Competency: Discover how tech leaders can transition to AI/ML, build foundational skills, grow with their teams, and embrace real-world applications for lasting impact.
• AI for Software Engineers: Evolve, Don’t Restart: Explore how software engineers can evolve into AI/ML roles, leveraging existing skills with practical insights and guidance.
• Land Your Dream AI/ML Job: A Practical Guide: Want to land your dream AI/ML job? This practical guide breaks down key strategies, from mastering technical skills to optimizing your resume and networking effectively, helping you stand out in the competitive AI job market.

About the article

Disclaimer: 

The views and opinions expressed in my articles are my own and do not represent those of my current or past employers, or any other affiliations.